Prison

Prison

Tuesday, 4 August 2015

City Trader Tom Hayes: Getting a ‘Lump’

One of the first questions any newly convicted prisoner gets asked on his or her arrival on a prison wing is “How long are you doing?” Once he gets through Reception – and perhaps a first night unit – one of the UK’s latest intake of cons, disgraced former City trader Tom Hayes, is going to be answering that question a fair few times. No doubt he will get used to telling fellow inmates that he has just been sent down for 14 years. That, as Ben, one of my witty mates from my own time inside would say, is “a real lump” of a sentence.

Tom Hayes: served a 'lump'
Of course, in reality despite the tabloid headlines Mr Hayes is ‘only’ going to be a prisoner for the next seven years. That’s still a long stretch.

Like the vast majority of white-collar cons he’ll probably keep his head down, conform to the prison rules and get released on licence in 2022 (assuming he doesn’t appeal either his sentence or conviction – or both). Then he’ll have another seven years under supervision back in the community, liable to recall to prison should he commit another offence or if his level of risk rises for any reason (excessive consumption of alcohol, taking drugs or anything else that might annoy his offender manager). He will have to live where he is told and until 2029 will only be permitted to work in a job that his supervisor has approved.

Double-cuffed to an escort
Still, all that is far in the future. Today Tom is now deep in the belly of the beast that is our prison system. 

I well remember the cold click of those bloody handcuffs before I was led out from the cells under the Crown Court for my first ride in a tiny locked cubicle inside a GEOAmey ‘sweatbox’ vehicle on my way to the local Cat-B nick. I think that’s the point you actually realise you are now merely a number and the property of the state… hands cuffed together, then double cuffed to an escort officer – just in case you suddenly decide to try to make a run for it in a moment of insane panic.   

A lengthy prison sentence – for whatever offence and whether you are in fact guilty or innocent – can be very hard to process at first. In Mr Hayes’ case, it was made very clear in the judge’s sentencing remarks that he would serve seven years in custody, but would be liable to recall to jail for a further seven years after his release. Nevertheless, I defy anyone to receive a ‘lump’ of a sentence like that and not feel utterly KO’d by it. 

Justice can be painful
For those who haven’t been inside, seven years is a long stretch – a lot longer than I did myself – although a fraction of what a life sentence is likely to be these days. There are various ways of getting your mind around such a penalty. Some cons start by working out the actual number of days in the custodial part of the sentence. 

Since he’s supposed to be pretty good with figures, our Tom will soon work out that he has 2,557 days (including two extra days for the leap years in 2016 and 2020) to reflect on his offences: rigging global Libor interest rates. As I type this post he has spent one night inside, so just 2,556 days and nights left. That is ‘a real lump’. And it will soon be confirmed in writing when a member of the prison staff hands him the document containing his sentence calculation.

Other coping strategies include marking off the days in a diary or on a calendar. At least a determinate-sentenced prisoner like Mr Hayes has that luxury, whereas a lifer (or anyone still serving the now discredited Indeterminate Sentence for Public Protection or IPP) remains in a state of limbo for years, usually well past any minimum tariff handed down in court, in some cases for decades. All IPPs received a nominal sentence calculation of ’99 years’. Imagine getting that paper shoved under your cell door during your breakfast and not choking on your soggy, stale cornflakes.

Last Chance saloon
If Mr Hayes and his legal team are planning to launch an appeal of some kind then the reality of his current situation might not kick in yet, despite all the humiliations of the dehumanising reception process. Somehow, at that stage, the sentence doesn’t seem ‘real’ until the final appeal has been dismissed. However, barring a successful outcome at the Court of Appeal (or Supreme Court), sooner or later the reality will sink in.

Given the length of the custodial element of his sentence, Mr Hayes’ won’t be heading to the relative comfort of a Cat-D (open) nick anytime soon. In most cases the maximum period that any prisoner is supposed to spend in open conditions is 24 months, so even with the best will in the world, he’ll not see the outside world again until at least late in 2020 and then only during Release on Temporary Licence (ROTL) from his Cat-D.

Since he will start his sentence as a Cat-B, that will still leave at least five years of closed conditions to survive. An educated guess is that he’ll serve around two years in a Cat-B before getting re-catted and transferred to a Cat-C training prison for a further three years or so, possibly a bit longer, before he gets reviewed and then – in all probability – approved for transfer to open conditions.

One of the problems that the Prison Service will face with Mr Hayes – as it does with any well-educated former professional – is what to do with him for the next seven years. His sentence planning will be an interesting exercise. 

Libor... now a dirty word
There are very few offending behaviour courses suitable for those convicted of similar financial offences, let alone the first man convicted in Britain of Libor-rigging. It might be a bit of a struggle for the average offender supervisor to fully understand the mechanics of the offences that earned Mr Hayes’ his sentence. I’m not convinced the usual victim awareness course on offer in most nicks is going to address this type of complex offending behaviour.   

I suspect he’ll end up working in prison education departments as a peer mentor supporting other cons with their literacy or numeracy. Otherwise, he might just end up mopping wing floors as a cleaner for the next few years – or else banged up in his cell for 23 hours a day. Who knows?

Typical Cat-B: Tom's new home for a few years
At the moment, however, I imagine that Tom is going through all the usual emotions common among first-timers. He’ll probably be shit scared as a result of watching too many US prison movies, such as The Shawshank Redemption, Cool Hand Luke or Brubaker. I very much doubt that he’ll be assaulted (or worse). Probably a fair number of cons will have seen him on the TV news and some will be interested in his case. Maybe a few will ask him for investment tips...

In reality, as long as he keeps his head down and avoids getting into debt or the temptation to try drugs, his worst enemies are likely to be regret and desperate boredom under the mind-numbing regime. Once he gets off of Entry level (the first two weeks) and out of grim – and grimy – prison clothing he’ll start to feel semi-human again. If he’s lucky he may make a few good mates who’ll provide advice and moral support – and he’ll come to realise just how much he will need the love of his own family to get through the coming years.

12 comments:

  1. As an officer (that doesn't always agree with you) I have to say I think you're spot on with this post.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for your comment. I always welcome feedback! It's interesting to get responses from staff - who obviously see a different side of prison life. That's why I am planning to use some more contributions from frontline officers in the near future.

      Delete
  2. I'm not saying that he didn't deserve the length of sentence that he got but he's got a lot longer of a sentence than a lot of people in for a violent offence get. Crazy isn't it that a first time offender with a non violent offence can get a longer sentence than someone with a rap sheet as long as your arm who bashed a granny into almost dying to knick off with her pension or who has run over and killed a small child?

    Mind you his sentence is on a par with people done for VAT fraud (one former copper got done for £365 million vat fraud carousel some years ago and got 10 years) so 14 years really isn't out of line compared with other large fraud cases..

    He's also now got the fun of POCA to undergo so he'll also end up completely penniless and if he doesn't pay another hefty sentence on top of the one he's already serving!

    In line with your comments about OB courses I'm really not sure what the prison service would be able to do in terms of OB courses and rehabilitation given its in one sense a "victimless" offence ie there is not an actual identifiable victim and all the people of the UK/the world is more than a bit nebulous as a victim (although my PO still to this day ludicrously maintains that the entire UK population is the victim of my VAT fraud offence which works out at a tiny fraction of 1 pence per head of population given the alleged value of the offence)

    The boredom will be the worst thing. Seven years of mind numbing tedium is enough to drive anyone potty.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for your comments. I agree that it does seem to be a very harsh sentence, particularly for a non-violent offence, however it seems to be a reflection of the times and the general level of hatred for bankers! I suppose that the message is the bigger the scale of the fraud, the tougher the sentence will be (in line with the sentencing guidelines, which are quite detailed).

      POCA will be a nightmare on top... and you're right. He and his family will be stripped of everything and unless the order is satisfied it will have implications for his security categorisation and future prospects for open conditions. I really wouldn't want to be in his shoes.

      I've had discussions on the issue of OB courses with loads of fellow cons and these sort of financial offences where there isn't a specific victim are tricky... and courses are arguably pointless, particularly where the supervising staff don't know much about the complex world of high finance! Probably a waste of time, but better than being banged-up all day for 22 hours or so!

      Delete
  3. Thank you Alex for a most informative post. I think this trader has been made a scapegoat for so many others and his sentence is crazy. An utter waste of tax payers money to keep him locked up for 7 years and on supervision after that.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for your comments. The problem is that there is a public appetite for vengeance against bankers, financiers and their ilk so there isn't going to be much sympathy for Tom, even if the custodial sentence will cost the taxpayer around 200 grand for the seven years inside, followed by a further seven on licence.

      However, I do agree that anyone in the banks who knew what was going on with Libor should - in theory, at least - face the consequences. It will be a scandal if senior managers and directors who also benefited do escape prosecution.

      Delete
  4. i half-expect you to know all of this already and to be familiar with the stanford prison experiment but maybe other people don't... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aqFZSkiDlaA this is a video with zimbardo, who initiated the experiment back in the day. i've always found it interesting for various reasons but it's shocking how little thought went into ethics then and how little he is interested in it even now.

    and i think the stanford prison experiment shows how easily an institution can become abusive simply by way of being an institution.

    ~martina

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Martina, thanks for your contribution. Indeed, I'm very familiar with the infamous Zimbardo experiment. I've seen similar processes at work in prisons - and in the armed forces. "Power corrupts; absolute power tends to corrupt absolutely."

      Delete
  5. Hi Alex, great blog. Do you have time for a chat? I'm a journalist and i'm working on a feature, which I'm keen to hear your thoughts on. My email is robyn.wilson@emap.com if you are able to get in touch.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Robyn, sure. I'll e-mail you. Alex

      Delete
  6. "Family Visitation Providers" Providing private and group transportation services to incarcerated love ones throughout the state of Florida. We are diligently working to bring you more routes and the best rates to help you stay connected to your incarcerated loved ones. We need your help! Please help us by spreading the word to other families! All prison trips requested will be added to our monthly schedule. Any questions or concerns please email info@familyvisitationproviders.com
    Phone: (305) 928-0363

    ReplyDelete
  7. "Family Visitation Providers" Providing private and group transportation services to incarcerated love ones throughout the state of Florida. We are diligently working to bring you more routes and the best rates to help you stay connected to your incarcerated loved ones. We need your help! Please help us by spreading the word to other families! All prison trips requested will be added to our monthly schedule. Any questions or concerns please email info@familyvisitationproviders.com
    Phone: (305) 928-0363

    ReplyDelete